Structuring a CorDapp

The source code for a CorDapp is divided into one or more modules, each of which will be compiled into a separate JAR. Together, these JARs represent a single CorDapp. Typically, a CorDapp contains all the classes required for it to be used standalone. However, some CorDapps are only libraries for other CorDapps and cannot be run standalone.

A common pattern is to have:

  • One module containing only the CorDapp’s contracts and/or states, as well as any required dependencies.
  • A second module containing the remaining classes that depend on these contracts and/or states.

However, this two-module structure is not prescriptive:

  • A library CorDapp containing only contracts and states would only need a single module.
  • In a CorDapp with multiple sets of contracts and states that do not depend on each other, each independent set of contracts and states would go in a separate module to reduce transaction size.
  • In a CorDapp with multiple sets of contracts and states that do depend on each other, either keep them in the same module or create separate modules that depend on each other.
  • The module containing the flows and other classes can be structured in any way because it is not attached to transactions.

You should base your project on one of the following templates:

Please use the branch of the template that corresponds to the major version of Corda you are using. For example, someone building a CorDapp on Corda 4.9 should use the release-V4 branch of the template.

The templates are built using Gradle. A Gradle wrapper is provided in the wrapper folder, and the dependencies are defined in the build.gradle files. See Building and installing a CorDapp for more information.

No templates are currently provided for Maven or other build systems.

The templates are split into two modules:

  • A cordapp-contracts-states module containing the contracts and states.
  • A cordapp module containing the remaining classes that depends on the cordapp-contracts-states module.

These modules will be compiled into two JARs - a cordapp-contracts-states JAR and a cordapp JAR - which together represent the Template CorDapp.

Here is the structure of the src directory for the cordapp-contracts-states module of the Java template:

.
└── main
    └── java
        └── com
            └── template
                ├── TemplateContract.java
                └── TemplateState.java

The directory only contains two class definitions:

  • TemplateContract
  • TemplateState

These are definitions for classes that we expect to have to send over the wire. They will be compiled into their own CorDapp.

Here is the structure of the src directory for the cordapp module of the Java template:

.
├── main
│   ├── java
│   │   └── com
│   │       └── template
│   │           ├── TemplateApi.java
│   │           ├── TemplateClient.java
│   │           ├── TemplateFlow.java
│   │           ├── TemplateSerializationWhitelist.java
│   │           └── TemplateWebPlugin.java
│   └── resources
│       ├── META-INF
│       │   └── services
│       │       ├── net.corda.core.serialization.SerializationWhitelist
│       │       └── net.corda.webserver.services.WebServerPluginRegistry
│       ├── certificates
│       └── templateWeb
├── test
│   └── java
│       └── com
│           └── template
│               ├── ContractTests.java
│               ├── FlowTests.java
│               └── NodeDriver.java
└── integrationTest
    └── java
        └── com
            └── template
                └── DriverBasedTest.java

The src directory is structured as follows:

  • main contains the source of the CorDapp
  • test contains example unit tests, as well as a node driver for running the CorDapp from IntelliJ
  • integrationTest contains an example integration test

Within main, we have the following directories:

  • java, which contains the source-code for our CorDapp:

    • TemplateFlow.java, which contains a template FlowLogic subclass
    • TemplateState.java, which contains a template ContractState implementation
    • TemplateContract.java, which contains a template Contract implementation
    • TemplateSerializationWhitelist.java, which contains a template SerializationWhitelist implementation
    • TemplateApi.java, which contains a template API for the deprecated Corda webserver
    • TemplateWebPlugin.java, which registers the API and front-end for the deprecated Corda webserver
    • TemplateClient.java, which contains a template RPC client for interacting with our CorDapp
  • resources/META-INF/services, which contains various registries:

    • net.corda.core.serialization.SerializationWhitelist, which registers the CorDapp’s serialisation whitelists
    • net.corda.webserver.services.WebServerPluginRegistry, which registers the CorDapp’s web plugins
  • resources/templateWeb, which contains a template front-end

In a production CorDapp:

  • We would remove the files related to the deprecated Corda webserver (TemplateApi.java, TemplateWebPlugin.java, resources/templateWeb, and net.corda.webserver.services.WebServerPluginRegistry) and replace them with a production-ready webserver.
  • We would also move TemplateClient.java into a separate module so that it is not included in the CorDapp.

Was this page helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!

Chat with us

Chat with us on our #docs channel on slack. You can also join a lot of other slack channels there and have access to 1-on-1 communication with members of the R3 team and the online community.

Propose documentation improvements directly

Help us to improve the docs by contributing directly. It's simple - just fork this repository and raise a PR of your own - R3's Technical Writers will review it and apply the relevant suggestions.

We're sorry this page wasn't helpful. Let us know how we can make it better!

Chat with us

Chat with us on our #docs channel on slack. You can also join a lot of other slack channels there and have access to 1-on-1 communication with members of the R3 team and the online community.

Create an issue

Create a new GitHub issue in this repository - submit technical feedback, draw attention to a potential documentation bug, or share ideas for improvement and general feedback.

Propose documentation improvements directly

Help us to improve the docs by contributing directly. It's simple - just fork this repository and raise a PR of your own - R3's Technical Writers will review it and apply the relevant suggestions.